EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT .........ON FACEBOOK ? --------- By Claire Wright Stanard
Isn’t it amazing how relevant something we were taught in high school has become today! Remember footnotes and bibliographies and citations when writing term papers? A student could get suspended from school for failing to cite resources, plagiarizing, or representing erroneous information as fact in research reports. As irrelevant as it all seemed years ago, today we search in vain for sourcing and long for reference integrity when assessing articles online or listening to cable news pundits.
Today’s online postings are basically anonymous as to where
they come from and how they arrived on our screens. China, Russia, robots, extremists, political
PACs, or targeted trolling, they all have one thing in common – propaganda. For those who did not live through the Cold
War 75 years ago, propaganda is “the deliberate spreading of fabricated ideas,
facts, and allegations to further one’s cause or damage an opposing cause.” Oppressive regimes control their citizens
through dispersing propaganda. Social media is blasted with it every day, but we
have no way to recognize the difference between propaganda and factual
accounts. And guess what? Everything on Fox News or MSNBC or even CNN
is NOT factual news; most are biased news entertainment opinion shows meant to
influence the viewer’s thinking. No one
is monitoring T.V., cable news programs, internet, or subscription streaming
services in regard to the veracity of the content. Obscenity, indecency, and profanity on
licensed T.V. broadcasting are the only elements of content regulated by the
FCC.
Since there are no government agencies monitoring/verifying
the credibility of news information and no regulations mandating referencing
sources, then how do consumers differentiate?
Psychologists agree that most people will instantly believe something is
true-in-fact if it aligns with their point of view. This is a global issue
which our laws have yet to address. While our system requires licensing to be a
dental hygienist, a sociologist, a plumber, a stock broker, and other
professions which must guarantee reliability, the journalist world is a free
for all. Anyone can create what appears to be a professional news article and
post it as truth, even if it is actually a fictionalized conspiracy theory.
And, anyone can appear on our screens claiming to be an expert with no
publicized credentials and present their opinions as verified facts. Today, the
most credible news source is the cell phone video, as demonstrated by the
George Floyd murder.
How can we assure accountability on social media platforms
and news entertainment shows? While
newspaper print journalism has historically been a self-disciplined profession adhering to universal standards, there are no criteria for identifying oneself as
a ‘journalist’ today. Media outlets assume no responsibility for the
content: Facebook claims it is nothing
but an open streaming site and hides behind the First Amendment in order to
push propaganda for profit; cable entertainment intentionally misleads by
presenting provocative opinions as real news and representing their pundits as
credible journalists; and, the instant nature of news today makes verifying
facts a lengthy, unprofitable process.
We must find a middle ground between censorship and responsible fact
checking in countering the confusing and influential power of the open mic
nature of news today. Believe it or not,
many people believe anything they read on Facebook or hear on cable news must
be the truth, or it wouldn’t be allowed to be publicized on these platforms.
I want to know where the writer or pundit obtained the
information they are reporting? Would
you buy a home without a clean title?
Would you buy an antique without verifying its provenance? Would you buy a car without checking CarFax?
Would you use a surgeon or doctor without a license or documented
credentials? With the endless abilities
of the tech world to create apps and algorithms for every need, why hasn’t
anyone created a fact checking application called TruFax which could be clicked
on while reading an online article (like we apply Spell Check) or while
listening to a cable news station pundit (like Shazam identifies songs). Just an idea!
Comments
Post a Comment