Dear Bill Maher
Dear Bill Maher:
I have watched you for as many years as you have been
featured on television. In fact, you
once asked to meet me when you saw me dining in an Aspen restaurant. I understand your HBO concept perfectly: you are first a comedian inciting commentary
on a variety of political and world issues while using your panels as your
straight men to produce provocative stimuli tempered by comedy. Sometimes you deviate, and are strictly a
pundit yourself. Obviously, it works or
you would not have stayed on air so long.
I truly enjoy your program and think it provides a much needed balance
to the Fox fare on TV and radio today.
However, (you knew there was about to be a “but”), as a
viewing audience member I sometimes feel arrogantly demeaned by you. There is an intolerance of others’ views
along with a personal agenda of yours that not only denigrates much of your
viewing audience, but detracts from your own credibility as a comic and a
pundit. This aspect is only present
during less than 10% of the show, but it tends to taint the preceding
banter.
Whenever a person insists they are “right” and there is no
grey area or other co-existing possibilities, I become suspect of their point
of view. I become even more suspect
when that person has the need to be evangelistic about their point of view. Often, your panelists appear too intimidated
to challenge you on your intractable, intolerant position.
The issue is your Atheism.
I accept and respect that you are an Atheist. There is no need for me to attempt to convert
you to believing in any kind of Higher Power or convert you to any religion. Your atheistic stance does not offend me
whatsoever. It is your business. I would never choose to demean you in regard
to your beliefs anymore than I would demean a Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist,
Rastafarian, or a member of the Pentecostal Church for their beliefs. Everyone has the right to worship or not
worship in the manner that he chooses or is individually convicted to him. That is religious tolerance, which was
supposedly the reason we began this country in the first place.
But you do not demonstrate religious tolerance on your show
or in your rhetoric. You describe those
who seek a spiritual connection through their religion or God of choice as
ignorant bumpkins who seek magical thinking as some sort of opium for the
masses. You deride believers and laugh
at religion derisively, as if Atheists, and you in particular, are the only
enlightened ones. Why do you need me to
believe as you do? And, who are you on a
show that promotes freedom of speech and freedom of choice to dismiss all
religious affiliations or beliefs as being fairy tales, anti- scientific,
having no basis in fact, and that the only true belief system is Atheism? Isn’t your Fundamentalist Atheist stance as
extreme and radical as the Fundamentalist Christian stance, leaving no room for
disagreement?
As to this writer, like you I began my spiritual life being
indoctrinated in Christian theology simply because of the family and location
where I happened to be born. While
maturing and seeking my own identity I studied world religions and
philosophies, and began to formulate a belief system that worked for me. As I grew older, my spiritual growth and
connection to life deepened and adapted to my experience of the world around
me. Science will NEVER be able to prove the
non-existence of a Higher Power, God, Allah, or whatever a person chooses to
call the source of their beliefs, because it is based on “choosing to believe”
– or what is commonly called “faith.”
Faith in a power greater than myself is not necessarily contrary to any
science, evolution, the universe, or any fact based ideas as to the origins of
life. I don’t even need to define that power, if I simply choose to believe
that there is one. Even looking to the
Bible for guidance is not unaligned with science, if a more allegorical
approach is taken.
And the “mysteries of life” are not necessarily “magical
thinking.” There will always be
mysteries and miracles in life that simply cannot be explained. I am an extremely well educated,
sophisticated, articulate, well-informed, attractive, upper middle class
woman. I could go toe to toe with you on
any matter and would not be nearly as obsequious as your panelists (only because I would not have
to fear not being invited back). But as
a viewer, your influence is waning for me, because of your insistence that
Atheism is the only reasonable belief system for the intelligentsia. I was brought up to appreciate that the
janitor in the White House was just as important as the President, and they
deserved equal respect. People whose
spiritual beliefs differ from yours (unless their objective is to do harm to
others) deserve the same respect as you desire for being an Atheist.
Sincerely,
Claire W. Stanard
P.S. And, yes, I have
seen your movie!
Comments
Post a Comment